<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Chicago Child Visitation Lawyer</title>
	<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog</link>
	<description>Chicago Child Visitation Lawyers and Attourneys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:56:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Court&#8217;s Jurisdiction</title>
		<description>Even if a court meets jurisdictional criteria, it may decline to exercise its jurisdiction, and it must in some cases if it finds that it is an inconvenient forum for making such determinations under the circumstances of the case and that a court of another state is a more appropriate ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=89</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Attorney Fee Affidavit</title>
		<description> 

                                                Atty. No. 
 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
 MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENT - SECOND DISTRICT

                                                      
Z AN ILLINOIS                  

CORPORATION,                      
               Plaintiff,       v.                               

 No.  2002 
TAMMY   

Defendant.       

 AFFIDAVIT REGARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES
I, Attorney of Record, being duly sworn on oath, having personal knowledge of the relevant herein, and if called as a witness would competently testify as follows:

1. That Affiants are attorneys, ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=88</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Non-Marital Property</title>
		<description>Gift
 The circuit court’s conclusion that the bracelet given to petitioner by respondent’s mother, who carried insurance on it, belonged to the petitioner was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence; therefore, bracelet was not included in marital property.  In re Simmons
 The trial court erred in awarding gold cross to ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=87</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Military Pension Are Marital Property Under Illinois Law</title>
		<description> The court abused its discretion in dividing military pension by failing to comply with § 401(b) of the Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/401(b)) to preserve jurisdiction for the distribution of military pension benefits.  In re Burkhart
 Military pensions may be treated as marital property under Illinois law and are subject to ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=86</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION</title>
		<description>Purpose of Requests for Admission

 Under Supreme Court Rule 216, a party can serve on any other party a written request for the admission of the truth of any fact or the genuineness of any document.  While the scope of a request is limited only by the imagination of the trial ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=85</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Support Obligations of a Parent</title>
		<description>The tiral court did not abuse its discretion by requiring father to pay the medical expenses of children to the extent those expenses were covered by his insurance. Imes v. Imes.
 The trial court did not abuse its discretion by setting the child support payments of father at $25 per week ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=84</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Child Support Issues in Family Law Cases</title>
		<description> Where there was no support in the record for the belief that the trial court’s decision on child support payments should be affected by defendant’s foster children, as he had no financial responsibility for them because they were provided for by the state, defendant’s foster children should not have been ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=83</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Evidence of Gift Shown</title>
		<description> Money loaned by the wife to her husband’s corporation was a gift rather than a loan since the wife testified that she considered that transfer of funds a loan, but there was conflicting testimony as to whether she had ever discussed with the husband the matter of repayment, and she ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=82</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Burden of Proof</title>
		<description> Because the parties stood in a relation of trust and confidence, appellant had the burden of showing the justness and fairness of his dealings with wife’s stocks.  Wesselhoeft v. Wesselhoeft
 Despite husband’s denial of donative intent and his continued control of property he purchased, he failed to rebut the presumption that ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=81</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Foreign Decree</title>
		<description>Lack of Personal Jurisdiction
 Wife could bring an action under a prior similar provision for the determination of equities in property and of alimony and attorney fees where the marital status had been determined by a valid ex parte foreign decree, but such latter court was without personal jurisdiction to determine ...</description>
		<link>http://www.chicago-child-visitation-lawyer.com/blog/?p=80</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
